The Threats to Wildfowl from Pollution

A review of the changing threats posed to wildfowl by pollution.

Nicholas Paling

 

Swans and other waterfowl are an important and highly valued part of our global wildlife. They represent key ecosystem components in both ecological and aesthetic terms and are, for many, an important food resource. However, despite their value waterfowl have historically faced a wide variety of threats from factors such as pollution, which have had negative impacts on their numbers and distribution. Today, although there is evidence that some species are recovering from the lows of the past, waterfowl continue to face both old and new threats from pollution that are putting their long-term persistence in jeopardy. The objectives of this review are to examine the past and present impacts of pollution on swans and other waterfowl, drawing on the documented reports of contamination and poisoning in the scientific literature, and to determine whether attempts to mitigate these impacts will be sufficient to ensure they have strong populations in the future.

 

Introduction

Concerted research efforts to examine the effects of environmental pollutants on waterfowl began in the 1960s and increased to a maximum in the 1980s and 1990s (Figure 1). Of these studies, over 90% have examined the contamination of waterfowl with lead and over 80% have been performed in swans.

 

 

    Table 1 lists studies that have examined the effects of contamination on approximately 9000 swans occurring in populations of all the six main species in 11 countries around the world.

 

Sources of Lead Pollution

A review of the scientific literature (shown in Table 1) reveals that the most serious environmental pollutant for wildfowl is lead. Lead becomes an environmental pollutant from three main sources; shotgun pellets, discarded fishing weights and as a by-product of mineral exploitation. Waterfowl ingest particulate material to aid mechanical digestion in their gizzards and are therefore vulnerable to lead contaminants in the sediment of their aquatic environment, particularly when it occurs in a small particulate form (see Figure 2A). As can be seen in Figure 2B, the prevalence of these different sources of lead contamination varies greatly between different countries. In the UK, the majority of studies have diagnosed lead poisoning resulting from the ingestion of lead artefacts such as shotgun pellets and fishing weights, while in North America, fishing weights have been a less significant source of contamination and lead contamination resulting from the ingestion of shotgun pellets and from mineral extraction has been more widely reported.

 

Impacts of Lead Contamination

Ingested lead is solubilised in the gizzard and enters the blood stream as lead (Pb2+) ions. Physiological effects are exerted through the ability of these ions to compete for binding sites for calcium (Ca2+) and, more significantly, zinc (Zn2+) ions in numerous important protein moieties, inhibiting their functions (Godwin, 2001). Lead has deleterious effects on the structure and function of the liver, bone, kidney, gastro-intestinal system, central nervous system and haematopoietic system (Eisler, 1988; Habal, 2004). The physical manifestations of lead toxicosis, termed plumbism, include impaction of food in the gut, anorexia, weight loss, bright green diarrhoea, ataxia, convulsions and bilateral limb paralysis, the latter giving swans a characteristic kink in their neck (Goulden, 2004). Successful treatment can be achieved through the intravenous administration of a chelating agent such as ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), which binds to lead ions preventing inhibition of the physiological targets and facilitating their removal from the body.

The impacts of lead poisoning on waterfowl populations are not well defined, but detailed surveys of mute swans in the UK do show a sharp decline in abundance in the 1980s which coincided with the peak of lead poisoning reports  (Figure 3A) (Baillie et al., 2005). Since the ban on lead fishing weights in 1986, mute swan numbers have recovered and more recently have been increasing. However, despite this increase in numbers, the conservation status of the mute swan has been upgraded from green to amber in recognition of the fact that the UK is home to over 20% of the European population and in light of the trend in mute swan breeding success, which is showing signs of falling for reasons that have not yet been determined (Figure 3B-C).

 

 

Recent studies in Spain have demonstrated that several species of birds higher up the food chain are also vulnerable to lead contamination of waterfowl. This contamination was most clearly seen in imperial eagles and red kites, 11 and 5.5% of which were found to have ingested lead shot respectively (Mateo et al., 2001a), and in marsh harriers, of which 52% were found to have high levels (>200ng/ml) of lead in their blood (Mateo et al., 1999). The levels of blood lead in the marsh harriers were deemed insufficient to have poisoned the birds, but were thought to be a factor that could have contributed to their breeding failures and population declines in the 1980s.

 

Mitigating the Impacts of Lead Pollution

The preponderance of evidence presented in the 1980s that lead shot and fishing weights were having a deleterious effect on swans (Table 1) and other waterfowl led to the introduction of widespread bans on their use. In accordance with the trends in Figure 2B, lead fishing weights were banned in the UK in 1986 and lead shotgun pellets were banned in the USA over important wetlands in 1988 and then for all waterfowl shooting in 1991.

Many studies have attempted to determine the effect of these bans on the incidence of lead contamination of waterfowl. Just 5 years after the banning of lead shot over Lake Catahoula in the USA in 1988, Moore et al. (1998) demonstrated that the proportion of diving ducks with lead shot in their gizzards had fallen from 27% to just 6%. These findings were mirrored by those of Samuel and Bowers (2000), who determined that between 1988 and 1999 in the Mississippi flyway the incidence of lead poisoning in American black ducks fell from 14.3% to 5.3%, and by those of Goulden (2005), veterinary surgeon for the UK Swan Sanctuary, who states that the incidence of lead poisoning in mute swans has fallen from 86% prior to the ban on lead fishing weights to just 2%.

In contrast, while in many areas bans on the use of lead shot and fishing weights have reduced the incidence of lead contamination in waterfowl, in other regions, such as the Coeur d’Alene River Basin in Idaho where lead pollution is derived more from mining and smelting than from lead artefacts, the ban had little effect on the high numbers of tundra swans (Blus et al., 1999), mallards and Canada geese (Henry et al., 2000) with lead poisoning. Indeed, the most recent study of this area has revealed that 77% of waterfowl mortality is still the result of lead poisoning by the contaminated sediment (Sileo et al., 2001).

In the UK, while the ban on lead fishing weights was introduced very early, bans on the use of lead shot have been slow to arrive and the previously voluntary phasing-out of lead shot on important wetlands only became law in 2000. This, in combination with the long-term persistence of lead in wetlands and other aquatic ecosystems, means that waterfowl are still suffering the legacy of previous lead use and is reflected in the findings of Kelly and Kelly (2004) who have recently reported that 74% of the swans surveyed in the East Midlands had blood lead levels of over 1.21 mmol/l (a significant but not lethal level of contamination). In the USA the situation is reversed, with fishing weights becoming an increasing problem just when the banning of lead shot has begun to reduce its impact on waterfowl.  In addition to this, several studies have demonstrated that although levels of ingested shot have fallen in many areas, the incidence of live birds with shotgun pellets embedded in their tissues as a result of being shot remains high (Moore et al., 1998; Hicklin and Barrow, 2004). The degree to which the presence of these shot impinges on the welfare of the animals in question has not yet been determined.

 

Emerging Threats to Waterfowl from Pollution

In addition to finding high levels of lead in swans, Kelly and Kelly (2004) also reported a high incidence of injury in swans (17%) resulting from other discarded fishing tackle such as line and hooks (e.g. see Figure 4). These findings are in accordance with reports from the Environment Agency who have estimated that around 37% of the 8000 swans treated in the UK each year are suffering from fishing tackle injuries (EA, 2002), and the findings of Franson et al. (2003) who examined 2,240 waterbirds in North America and noted that many were suffering from ingestion or entanglement in fishing tackle such as line and hooks.

 

 

Another emerging threat to local waterfowl populations from pollution is global climate change. This phenomenon is though to be is causing shifts in the migration routes of Bewick’s swans and Whooper swans in northern Europe, with the result that the numbers of these birds wintering in the UK and Ireland have begun to fall (Cranswick et al., 1999; Colhoun, 2000). The long-term effects of climate change on waterfowl populations remain to be determined.

 

Future Directions

To ensure the long-term future of all waterfowl species it is clear that further dispersal of lead into the environment must be prevented. To achieve this, the shooting industry, like the angling industry before it, must take up the challenge of finding alternative materials for the fabrication of their shot. Several materials, such as zinc (French et al., 1987), calcium carbonate (Schnug and Haneklaus, 2001), steel and bismuth (Thomas, 1997), have been proposed as environmentally friendly alternatives to lead shot. However, while in some countries such as Denmark and the Netherlands lead shot have been banned entirely, in others hunters and shooting organisations still actively oppose the introduction of non-toxic substitutes (Thomas, 1997).

Furthermore, as the threat from lead is being reduced it seems that it is being replaced by new threats from pollution. Of these the huge increase in the amount of tackle being discarded into aquatic ecosystems as a result of the expansion of course fishing as a pastime globally is perhaps the most significant. In the UK, in response to concern over this issue, the National Angling Alliance has produced a Code of Conduct for Course Anglers and set up the Angling and Swans Liaison Group, which have both been heavily endorsed by conservation organisations. However, whether these schemes will be successfully implemented and will reverse the impacts of fishing tackle on waterfowl is not yet known (NAA, 2002).

Perhaps another area of concern for the future of waterfowl conservation is the apparent iconic status of swans in this field of research. This status has led to swans becoming a ‘flagship’ species for waterfowl as a whole and has surely helped to raise awareness of the conservation issues regarding waterfowl. However, it is clear from the literature that swans have been the focus of a disproportionately large section of the research into the impacts of pollution on waterfowl and that some other waterfowl species, which are of greater conservation concern and which may be more vulnerable to the deleterious impacts of pollution, have been the subject of far fewer studies. This is illustrated by the fact that only one study has examined the serious impact that lead-poisoning is having on the globally threatened marbled teal and white-headed ducks in Spain (Mateo et al., 2001b). It is clear that more research into the effects of pollution on species other than swans is required to ensure that waterfowl biodiversity is maintained into the future.

 

References

Andersen-Harild, P., Clausen, B., Elvestad, K. and Preuss, N. O. (1982) Lead pellets in tissues of mute swans (Cygnus olor) from Denmark. Danish Reviews in Game Biology 12; 3-12.

Baillie, S. R., Marchant, J. H., Crick, H. Q. P., Noble, D. G., Balmer, D. E., Beaven, L. P., Coombes, R. H., Downie, I. S., Freeman, S. N., Joys, A. C., Leech, D. I., Raven, M. J., Robinson, R. A. and Thewlis, R. M. (2005) Breeding Birds in the Wider Countryside: their conservation status 2004. BTO Research Report No. 385. http://www.bto.org/birdtrends

Bartonek, J. C., Serie, J. R. and Converse, K. A. (1991) Mortality in tundra swans Cygnus columbianus. Proceedings of the 3rd IWRB International swan symposium Wildfowl Supplement 1; 356-358

Beyer, W. N., Audet, D. J., Heinz, G. H., Hoffman, D. J. and Day, D. (2000b) Relation of waterfowl poisoning to sediment lead concentrations in the Coeur d’Alene River Basin.  Ecotoxicology 9; 207-218.

Beyer, W. N., Day, D., Melancon, M. J. and Sileo, L. (2000a) Toxicity of Anacostia River, Washington, DC, USA, sediment fed to mute swans.  Environmental Toxicological Chemistry 19; 731-735.

Beyer, W. N., Day, D., Morton, A. and Pachepsky, Y. (1998) Relation of lead exposure to sediment ingestion in mute swans on the Chesapeake Bay, USA. Environmental Toxicological Chemistry 17; 2298-2301.

Birkhead, M. (1982) Causes of mortality in the mute swan Cygnus olor on the River Thames. Journal of Zoology 198; 15-25.

Birkhead, M. E. and Perrins, C. M. (1985) The breeding biology of the mute swan Cygnus olor on the River Thames with special reference to lead poisoning. Biological Conservation 32; 1-11.

Birkhead, M. E. and Perrins, C. M. (1986) The mute swan. p157

Bloch, D. and Kraul, I. (1972) Residues of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) and organochlorine insecticides in eggs from mute swan (Cygnus olor) and pochard (Aythya ferina). Acta vet. Scand. 13; 588-590.

Blus, L. J. (1994) A review of lead poisoning in swans. Comp. Biological Physiology 108; 259-267.

Blus, L. J., Henry, C. J., Hoffman, D. J. and Grove, R. A. (1991) Lead toxicosis in tundra swans near a mining and smelting complex in northern Idaho. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 21; 549-555.

Blus, L. J., Henry, C. J., Hoffman, D. J., Sileo, L. and Audet, D. J. (1999) Persistence of high lead concentrations and associated effects in tundra swans captured near a mining and smelting complex in northern Idaho. Ecotoxicology 8; 125-132.

Blus, L. J., Stroud, R. K., Reiswig, B. and McEneaney, T. (1989) Lead poisoning and other mortality factors in trumpeter swans. Environmental Toxicological Chemistry 8; 263-271.

Bowes, V. (1992) Lead poisoning in trumpeter swans. Canadian Veterinary Journal 33; 554.

Brown, M. J., Linton, E. and Rees, E.R. (1992) Causes of mortality among wild swans in Britain. Waterfowl 43; 70-79.

Cranswick, P. A., Abuladze, A. and Quinn, J. L. (1999) Ornithological surveys of the western route export pipeline in Azerbaijan and Georgia: December 1998. WWT Wetlands Advisory Service Report to the Georgian Pipeline Company p17.

Colhoun K. et al. (2000) Numbers and distribution of Whooper and Bewick’s Swans in Ireland: results of the international swan census, January 2000. Irish Birds 6; 485-494.

Degernes, L. A. and Frank, R. K. (1991) Causes of mortality in cygnus buccinator in Minnesota 1986-1989. Proceedings of the 3rd IWRB International swan symposium Wildfowl Supplement 1; 352-355

Eisler, R. (1988) Lead hazards to fish, wildlife and invertebrates: a synoptic view. US Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 85; 134

Elvestad, K., Karlog, O. and Clausen, B. (1982) Heavy metals (copper, cadmium, lead, mercury) in mute swans from Denmark. Nordic Veterinary-Medicine 34; 92-97.

Environment Agency (2002) Report on the incidence of fishing tackle injury in swans in the UK. Environment Agency, UK.

Eskildsen, J. and Grandjean, P. (1984) Lead exposure from lead pellets: Age-related accumulation in mute swans. Toxicology Letters 21; 225-229.

Esselink, H. and Beekman, J. H. (1991) Between year variation in the non-breeding population of the mute swan Cygnus olor in the Netherlands, with special reference to hunting. Proceedings of the 3rd IWRB International swan symposium Wildfowl Supplement 1; 110-119.

Frank, A. and Borg, K. (1979) Heavy metals in the tissues of the mute swan (Cygnus olor). Acta vet. scand. 20; 447-465.

Franson, J. C., Hansen, S. P., Creekmore, T. E., Brand, C. J., Evers, D. C., Duerr, A. E. and DeStefano, S. (2003) Lead fishing weights and other fishing tackle in selected waterbirds. Waterbirds 26; 345-352.

French, M. C. (1982) Lead poisoning in mutes swans — an east Anglian survey. Metals in Animals Nat. Environ. Res. Counc. Inst. Terrestrial Ecol. pp. 25-29.

French, M. C. (1984) Lead poisoning in mute swans. Annual Report of the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology pg. 88.

French, M. C., Haines, C. W. and Cooper, J. (1987) Investigation into the effects of ingestion of zinc shot by mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Environmental Pollution 47; 305-314.

Godwin, H. A. (2001) Why is lead toxic? Molecular mechanisms of lead poisoning. Biophysical Journal 80; 372.

Goulden, S. (2005) Lead poisoning in swans. The Swan Sanctuary http://www.swanuk.org.uk/index%20frame.htm

Habal, R. (2005) Lead toxicity. E-medicine Critical Care Articles

http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic1269.htm

Hardman, J. A. and Cooper, D. R. (1980) Mute swans on the Warwickshire Avon – a study of a decline. Wildfowl 31; 29-36.

Henry, C. J., Blus, L. J., Hoffman, D. J., Sileo, L., Audet, D. J. and Snyder, M. R. (2000) Field evaluation of lead effects on Canada geese and the mallards in the Coeur d’Alene River Basin, Idaho. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 39; 97-112.

Hicklin, P. W. and Barrow, W. R. (2004) The incidence of embedded shot in waterfowl in Atlantic Canada and Hudson Strait. Waterbirds 27; 41-45.

Honda, K., Lee, D. P. and Tatsukawa, R. (1990) Lead poisoning in swans in Japan. Environmental Pollution 65; 209-218.

Irwin, J. C. (1975) Mortality factors in whistling swans at Lake St. Clair, Ontario. Journal of Wildlife Disease 11; 8-12.

Kelly, A. and Kelly, S. (2004) Fishing tackle injury and blood lead levels in mute swans. Waterbirds 27; 60-68.

Kobayashi, Y., Shimada, A. Umemura, T. and Nagai, T. (1992) An outbreak of copper poisoning in mute swans (Cygnus olor). Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 54; 229-233.

Koh, T. –S. and Harper, M. J. (1988) Lead poisoning in black swans, Cygnus atratus, exposed to spent shot at Bool Lagoon Game Reserve, South Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 15; 395-403.

Krieger, R. I. (1990) Toxicity and bioavailability studies of lead and other elements in the lower Coeur d’Alene River. Idaho BLM Tech. Bulletin 90-93.

Langelier, K. M., Tolksdorf, M., Herunter, S., Campbel, R. and Lewis, R. (1989) Lead levels in trumpeter swans (Cygnus buccinator) in British Columbia in 1989. Wildlife Veterinary Report 2; 8.

MacDonald, J. W., Clunas, A. J., Eatough, C. J., Isherwood, P. and Ruthven, A. D. (1987) Causes of death in Scottish swans (Cygnus spp.). State Veterinary Journal 41; 165-175.

Mateo, R., Cadenas, R.,Manez, M. and Guitart, R. (2001a) Lead shot ingestion in two raptor species from Donana, Spain. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 48; 6-10.

Mateo, R., Estrada, J., Paquet, J. Y., Riera, X., Dominguez, L., Guitart, R. and Martinez-Vilalta, A. (1999) Lead shot ingestion by marsh harriers Cicus aeruginosus from the Ebro Delta, Spain. Environmental Pollution 104; 435-440.

Mateo, R., Green, A. J., Jeske, C. W., Urios, V. and Gerique, C. (2001b) Lead poisoning in the globally threatened marbled teal and white-headed duck in Spain. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 20; 2860-2868.

Moore, J. L., Hohman, W. L., Stark, T. M. and Weisbrich, G. A. (1998) Shot prevalences and diets of diving ducks five years after ban on use of lead shotshells at Catahoula Lake, Louisiana. Journal of Wildlife Management 62; 564-569.

Mudge, G. P. (1983) The incidence and significance of ingested lead pellet poisoning in British waterfowl. Biological Conservation 27; 333-372.

National Angling Alliance (2002) NAA Code of conduct for course anglers. http://www.anglers-net.co.uk/saa/Code2002.htm

Nature Conservancy Council (1981) Lead poisoning in swans. Report of the Nature Conservancy Council’s Working Group p44.

Ochiai, K., Kimura, T., Uematsu, K. and Itakura, C. (1999) Lead poisoning in waterfowl in Japan. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 35; 766-769.

Ochiai, K., Jin, K., Itakura, C., Goryo, M., Yamashita, K., Mizuno, N., Fujinaga, T. and Tsuzuki, T. (1992) Pathological study of lead poisoning in whooper swans (Cygnus cygnus) in Japan. Avian Disease 36; 313-352.

O’Halloran, J., Myers, A. A. and Duggan, P.F. (1988a) Blood lead levels and free red blood cell protoporphyrin as measure of lead exposure in mute swans. Environmental Pollution 52; 19-38.

O’Halloran, J., Duggan, P. F. and Myers, A. A. (1988b) Biochemical and haematological values for mute swans (Cygnus olor): Effects of acute lead poisoning. Avian Pathology 17; 667-678.

O’Halloran, J., Myers, A. A. and Duggan, P. F. (1988c) Lead poisoning in swans and sources of contamination in Ireland. Journal of Zoology 216; 211-223.

O’Halloran, J., Myers, A. A. and Duggan, P. F. (1989) Some sub-lethal effects of lead on mute swan Cygnus olor. Journal of Zoology 218; 627-632.

Owen, M. and Cadbury, C. J. (1975) Winter feeding ecology and mortality of swans in the Ouse Washes, England. Wildfowl 26; 31-42.

Pennycott, T. W. (1999) Causes of mortality in Mute Swans Cygnus olor in Scotland 1995-1996.  Waterfowl 50; 11-20.

Quick, M. P. (1993) Suspected hydrocarbon poisoning of swans and guillemots.  Journal of Forensic Science Society 33; 143-148.

Samuel , M. D. and Bowers, E. F. (2000) Lead exposure in American black ducks of non-toxic shot. Journal of Wildlife Management 64; 947-953.

Schnug, E. and Haneklaus, S. (2001) Calcium carbonate pellets from drinking water decarbonisation as a substitute for lead in shotgun cartridges. Landbauforschung Volkenrode 51; 1-4.

Sears, J. (1988) Regional and seasonal variations in lead poisoning in the mute swan Cygnus olor in relation to the distribution of lead and lead weights, in the Thames area, England. Biological Conservation 46; 115-134.

Sears, J., Cooke, S. W. Cooke, Z. R. and Heron, T. J. (1989) A method for the treatment of lead poisoning in the mute swan (Cygnus olor) and its long-term success. British Veterinary Journal 145; 586-595.

Sears, J. and Hunt, A. (1991) Lead poisoning in mute swans Cygnus olor in England. Proceedings of the 3rd IWRB International swan symposium Wildfowl Supplement 1; 383-388.

Sileo, L. Creekmore, L. H., Audet, D. J., Snyder, M. R., Meteyer, C. U., Franson, J. C., Locke, L. N., Smith, M. R. and Finley, D. L. (2001) Lead poisoning of waterfowl by contaminated sediment in the Coeur d’Alene River. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 41; 364-368.

Simpson, V. R., Hunt, A. E. and French, M. C. (1979) Chronic lead poisoning in a herd of mute swans. Environmental Pollution 18; 187-201.

Spray, C. J., and Milne, H. (1988) The incidence of lead poisoning among whooper and mute swans Cygnus cygnus and C. olor in Scotland. Biological Conservation 44; 265-281.

Thomas, V. G. (1997) The environmental and ethical implications of lead shot contamination of rural lands in North America. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10; 41-54.

US Geological Survey Mute Swan Biological and Ecotoxicological Characteristics Website (2005) http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/bioeco/default.htm

Wilson, L. K., Elliott, J. E., Langelier, K. M., Scheuhammer, A. M. and Bowes, V. (1998) Lead poisoning of trumpeter swans, Cygnus buccinator, in British Columbia, 1976-1994. Canadian Field-Naturalist 112; 204-211.

 

© Nick Paling and Conservation Issues UK: All rights reserved.

 

 Search CI-UK:
P
owered by FreeFind

Conservation Issues UK

Current issues in the efforts to conserve Britain's natural Heritage

 Home |  Site Map | About | Contacts | Contribute